It seems to be used which have specific verbs or perhaps in a good specific sense of the brand new verb

It seems to be used which have specific verbs or perhaps in a good specific sense of the brand new verb

/bi-/ could have been reported to have locative-terminative force in the place of strictly locative push for /ba-/, however, Thomsen says toward p. 184, that it “may perhaps be maybe not instantly used for how come away from concord having an effective loc.-name. otherwise loc. noun, nevertheless as an alternative serves this new semantic differentiation of verb. “

>ba(I): has actually a separative form. When you look at the OBGT it closely correlates which have >Akkadian t-stems. (Thomsen, following the Jacobsen, confuses t-stems >to the Akkadian primary.) Their status is actually once the fresh ventive >marker yards and then the b try soaked up: m-ba- > m-ma, whenever this is >followed by a 2nd people pronoun, it will become m-ma > m-mu (so ba >is not always simple to recognize). Continue reading “It seems to be used which have specific verbs or perhaps in a good specific sense of the brand new verb”

Scroll to top